Tuesday, January 22, 2013

40 Years After Roe V. Wade

I am pro-life as most of you already know.  There is no EXCUSE to murder a living being regardless of what stage of development they are in.  Below is a link to a VERY graphic page of aborted babies in different stages of life.  

I was going to post the pictures here, but thought better to send people to the link.


WARNING:  THE VIDEO BELOW SHOWS A BABY BEING ABORTED. 

This is what Obama and his pro-choice followers condone. And I want people to see the true reality of abortion.

For those like me, I burst out crying.  This is very difficult to watch.  





Below:

PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION PROCEDURE WITH REAL INSTRUMENTS. A doll is used, not a real baby. But it is explained and shown exactly how it is done. And it is still difficult to watch.



NUFF SAID......

26 comments:

Always On Watch said...

For 18 years, I worked in a private Christian school. Yes, we showed videos such as these to our 8th-12th graders.

Are videos such as these shown in public schools? Not to my knowledge. Such videos should be a routine part of sex education -- be that sex education school-based or family-based.

Always On Watch said...

Leticia,
You might find THIS of interest. Excerpt:

...The stroke rate among young adults has been historically low, but the CDC says the number of hospitalized stroke patients ages 15 to 44 is on the rise and jumped one-third between 1995 and 2008....

[...]

...doctors believe birth control pills she took for pelvic pain led to a tiny blood clot that traveled through a small flap in her heart to her brain...


In many ways, oral contraceptives for women have done a lot of good. But is there a "hidden" cost also going on? I think so. Females are taking birth control bills at younger and younger ages.

Jersey McJones said...

40 years after RvW...

Crime and a host of other social ills are way down.

Women earn far more than they did and achieve far more academic and professional success.

Deaths from abortion complications are a tiny fraction of what they were before RvW.

...And could you imagine what the welfare state would be like right now if it weren't for RvW??? And you conservatives certainly don't care about what happens to babies after they're born!

Overall, it's been a very, very positive thing.

JMJ

Jersey McJones said...

Oh, and "partial birth abortion" (a term invented by the anti-abortion crowd) had been going on long before RvW, as it is an emergency medical procedure employed when the life of a mother is at risk (yet another born life you guys just don;t care about at all).

JMJ

Liberalmann said...

Yeah let's go back to a time when a woman paid a butcher in some alley with a coat hanger. Morons.

Liberalmann said...

Chris Matthews Backs Anti-Abortion Shill Into A Corner

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/chris-matthews-backs-anti-abortion-sh

Leticia said...

AOW, I agree at that age group they need to be shown and witness the horrible reality of abortion. Thanks for the link.

Jersey, I most certainly do care what happens to babies that are left for adoption. I have friends that have adopted children, black children, so you can't judge us. We care about every life.

One more thing, there is ABSOLUTELY no medical necessity that partial-birth abortion is required. You are seriously disillusioned if you believe the garbage you just spewed.

Lib, yeah it figures you would condone these awful and vile procedures. Where is your heart and compassion for the baby? None, I guess. That's truly sad. Apparently the life of a child means zip to you. Why am I not surprised?



Jersey McJones said...

Leticia,

There are about 40,000 adoptions a year in the us. There are well over a million abortions. There is no market that exists to adopt all those babies.

There is no such a medical term as "partial-birth abortion." You guys just made that up. Not "garbage," fact. Scientific fact. No religious mythology. Not rabid ideology. Real. Scientific. Fact.

Yes, I can judge. Conservatives support policies damaging to children and regular working families. You can't force people to have babies and then leave them with no opportunity to have a decent shot at a decent life.

JMJ

Leticia said...

Jersey, yes there is such thing as partial-birth abortion, look it up. And your dear president condoned it. I wish somehow this would have opened your eyes to what abortion really is and that generations are being murdered off, but what do you care, right? It's not you being brutally murdered and torn to pieces.

Jersey McJones said...

Leticia, "partial birth abortion" is a term you guys invented to describe several different, very unpleasant, procedures used during very serious surgical procedures. There are a variety of reasons why such a drastic procedure must be employed, but I don't think you know about any of this or care to. You just want to believe what you want to believe.

It's other women's lives. It has no impact on you whatsoever. Why can't you just leave them alone?

Oh, and I don't care for being compared to a fetus. I'm a grown man.

JMJ

Leticia said...

Do you not realize with all the children being murdered, that generations of people are being annihilated? This will effect those of us in our retiring years, and I have done a lot of research on abortion, have you? Or do you even care?

Back in 2003, Obama made it very clear that he supported late-term abortions—a euphemism that includes intact dilation and extraction, or "partial birth abortion." He justified this position by saying women “know better than anybody the tragedy of a difficult pregnancy.” In fact, he touted that he voted specifically to protect partial birth abortion in Illinois.

Right Truth said...

What a terrible thing to celebrate, and that is exactly what the pro-abortion crowd does. There was a vile video out, can't remember who published it.

Debbie
Right Truth
http://www.righttruth.typepad.com

Right Truth said...

Here is is

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/skanky-sick-ad-titled-happy-anniversary-baby/

Jersey McJones said...

Leticia, if we lived in a society in which we truly felt appreciated, in which we truly had opportunity learn and grow and succeed, then maybe, just maybe, there'd be fewer abortions.

JMJ

Anonymous said...

Leticia is proof that they'll let any dummy have a blog.

Teresa said...

It really takes a sick person to advocate for the killing of an innocent human being instead of advocating that both the baby and mom get the help they need instead of advocating for murder. I don't think liberals know the concept of sacrifice and sacrificing of oneself in the name of love. Loving something greater than self. But not worshiping false idols like Obama, Hollywood actors, or sports players. They usually call for everyone else to make the sacrifices for them. They think carrying the baby for nine months, allowing the baby to live, and giving a couple who is unable to conceive the chance to adopt and love that child is a burden. Their consciences will have to live with murder and the advocating of murder. Hopefully someday they will have a conversion for their souls sake.

Actually if there weren't any abortions out problems with funding government programs would be nearly the issue it is today, especially as far as funding all the baby boomers.

Teresa said...

Jersey's last comment is an example of progressivism bringing us down. The negativity and whiny can't do attitude, like progressives blaming others for their woes instead of picking themselves up, being positive and doing their best to change their situation is why this country is going to pot.

Teresa said...

In my first comment "out" is supposed to be our - or problems

Leticia said...

Debbie, thank you for the link. Whew!

Jersey, we do have that kind of society and so many wonderful opportunities. But I have known women who chose to abort their babies because they see it as a contraceptive instead of using contraceptives. One person, in particular, aborted her baby boy, because he was going to get in the way of her partying, she was in her 30's at the time. My sister BEGGED her to have the baby and she and her husband would adopt the baby. She declined and killed the baby. And for your information, this baby was half Black and Mexican. And still was desperately wanted. She didn't care. She aborted that baby.

Children are blessing, such beautiful precious gifts. And as a mother who was only able to conceive twice, I thought my heart would break into a million pieces when I was told I would never conceive again. Adoption...would be wonderful, regardless of the race of the child. Many people in this world long to have a child, to hold, to cherish.

There is no excuse to murder the innocent. None. No matter how many arguments we hear from those that support infanticide. A life is being brutally destroyed.

Anon, so typical. The only dummy here are those who have nothing worthwhile to say, except to insult. Well done for speaking for the liberals, I am quite sure they embrace your lack of intellect.

Liberalmann said...

So...what do you think of this?

Catholic hospital chain beats malpractice suit by saying fetuses aren’t people;

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/24/catholic-hospital-chain-beats-malpractice-suit-by-saying-fetuses-arent-people/

Teresa said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Teresa said...

Some Catholic institutions are CINO and have dissented on essential obligatory teachings. It seems like the hospital was responsible for the twins deaths. Very sad indeed. But the "Catholic" hospital should not have argued as they did. They should have won by using moral arguments, not by selling their souls to the devil just so they wouldn't have to pay money. This is why the Pope has called for reform for some Catholic hospitals and universities in the U.S. If they refuse then they will be stripped of their Catholicity, their Catholic name, and they won't get any Catholic support from the diocese.

The twins were indeed babies fully human and could have been viable outside the womb if the emergency staff had acted properly.

Leticia said...

Lib, disgusted, truthfully. And Teresa well done.

dmarks said...

I see once again the defenders of the indefensible think it is a great idea to kill the most vulnerable people. Jersey even argues that the human race is better off with millions of people snuffed out. Sad, really.

highboy said...

So much drivel to respond to, so little time. But here goes. First I'll address Liberlmann's usual nonsense since its the easiest to refute:

"Yeah let's go back to a time when a woman paid a butcher in some alley with a coat hanger. Morons."

You're right. We should make/keep everything legal, so that way those doing the act won't do it dangerously on their own. Murder should be legal, otherwise the murderer using the butcher knife might be reduced to using a real sharp thorn bush. Thanks for playing.

and Jersey:

"40 years after RvW...

Crime and a host of other social ills are way down.

Women earn far more than they did and achieve far more academic and professional success.

Deaths from abortion complications are a tiny fraction of what they were before RvW.

...And could you imagine what the welfare state would be like right now if it weren't for RvW??? And you conservatives certainly don't care about what happens to babies after they're born!

Overall, it's been a very, very positive thing."

Maybe you can show me the direct correlation than between women having abortions and what they earn for a living, or the other host of progressions you fallaciously attributed to RvW?

"There are about 40,000 adoptions a year in the us. There are well over a million abortions. There is no market that exists to adopt all those babies."

So let's just kill them all? Not to mention of course there are more abortions. Its cheaper by far, easier, and legal. I think that's the point of the post.

"Leticia, "partial birth abortion" is a term you guys invented to describe several different, very unpleasant, procedures used during very serious surgical procedures. There are a variety of reasons why such a drastic procedure must be employed, but I don't think you know about any of this or care to. You just want to believe what you want to believe."


You have a problem with the term, but its accurate. I have a problem with the practice, and while I can't speak for Leticia, I'm very well versed in all the b.s. subjective reasons a woman might have to crack a baby's skull like an egg shell on its way out of the womb with a rubber mallet, or stab it in the back of the head with a pair of scissors when its halfway out of the womb. I'm also aware of the stupid reasons behind saline abortions, the fashionable process of almost literally setting the fetus on fire inside the womb. Look up a friend of mine, Brandy Lozier. She survived one. Why don't you tell her that by rights she shouldn't be alive?

"It's other women's lives. It has no impact on you whatsoever. Why can't you just leave them alone?

Oh, and I don't care for being compared to a fetus. I'm a grown man."

Wow. A couple of things to that:

First of all, if someone murders someone across the country from me, its not my life, that doesn't mean I shouldn't care if the law lets it happen. Get it? Its not just the woman's life, that is the point. If you disagree that what is inside the womb isn't a life, than argue that, prove that with a logical reason why. But if it is a life, than it has a right to life just like she does. The right to life is not a subjective thing, or at least shouldn't be, dependent on the emotional or medical status of the female. Its either a human life or it isn't. As for you being compared to a fetus, just deal with it. That fetus is a living human organism, and is just as valuable as you. The fact that you have a bigger muscular or mental stature doesn't make you more human, and doesn't give you any more of a right to live than the fetus.

Leticia said...

Highboy, Wow! I couldn't have said it better myself, my friend. Thank you!