Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Harvey Milk Gay Day now the law

SaveCalifornia.com has launched a new drive to protest a pro-homosexual bill recently signed into law.

Harvey Milk Gay Day" has been signed by Arnold Schwarzenegger for California government schools, and a handful of sexual indoctrination laws already existing that are in effect throughout the entire school year

California is also among the lowest academically in the country. On the sexual indoctrination chart, California leads the pack with Massachusetts following. Which is not at all surprising. That is nothing to write home about.

Given these statistics, the West Coast pro-family, pro-child organization, all concerned parents, Christian or not should get involved and trying to boycott this bill that was passed. It is demented, immoral and no student should have to be forced or coerced into understanding homosexuals deviant behavior. I am truly hopeful that many people are going to rise up and put an end to this atrocity.


A little history about Harvery Milk, 1) Harvey Milk was a sexual predator of teenagers 2) Milk advocated having multiple sexual relationships at the same time 3) Milk promoted lying to get ahead.

So in a nutshell, this man was immoral, reckless in his sexual escapades, a pedophile, and a liar. And this is what California wants to promote as a role model???!

I knew we lived in a sick and twisted world, but this is ridiculous! I am truly at a loss for words.

I wish that there was a way for churches to open up Christian schools and let them be free or have very, very small tuition fees. Parents need an option.

32 comments:

foutsc said...

That fence between us and Mexico we need built? We should swing it north just west of Arizona.

Wanna know where Obama is taking us, America?

Just look at intellectually, morally and financially bankrupt California, brought to you by unbridled liberalism.

Karen Howes said...

This IS ridiculous, Leticia. As I've been saying, though, there's no criminal, pervert, or tyrant the left doesn't admire.

foutsc said...

So true, Karen.

Jack Cashill does a great job cataloging lefty hero worship of all manner of scum in his book "Hoodwinked."

I highly recommend it.

Steve Harkonnen said...

Why is there this persistent NEED to celebrate faggotry in the first place? That's what I don't understand.

Leticia said...

foutsc, California is just a preview or prelude of things that will happen to our nation and Obama is leading the way.

Karen, it is like they have completely lost all their senses and sanity. They embrace the vile, deviant society. I just don't understand it. I wonder if they will have a Charlie Manson Day?

Steve if you ever find the answer to that question enlighten the rest of us. It is sick and very disturbing how the Left embrace this horrid lifestyle. Why?

Most Rev. Gregori said...

Well I for one will NOT be drinking any Harvey Milk.

The new hate Crimes Bill has just been signed into law by BHO. Now all of the sexual perverts are specially protected by law. I suppose that all of straight folks better start wearing chastity belts on our butts.

jez said...

gregori, yeah you really should, it might muffle your voice and help you make less of a fool of yourself.

MK said...

What amazes me is that california is so far down the toilet thanks to leftism, yet they still don't get it.

Sounds like you're a real expert on asses and muffling your voice. Enjoy the weekend chump.

Leticia said...

Abouna I heard on AFR about the Hate Crimes Bill, and I am very angry and completely in shock.

Jez, please be nice, kiddo. Abouna is expressing his moral outrage as many us tend to do.

MK, the government wants the entire nation run like California. I just cannot grasp how ignorant, blind and biased our government officials truly are.

jez said...

Always trying to be nice Let, but Abouna is expressing his mistaken belief that he is at all likely to be raped by a man. That's not moral outrage, that's just wrong. I'm willing to bet you and him ice-creams that he won't be raped by a man. I'd be very surprised if male gay rape went up as a result of the hate crimes bill.

I wonder what made you single out my remark which amounts to "i think you're talking out of your ass," -- a little bit brisk but basically tame -- but ignored Abouna's which throws around the idea of anal rape, and MK's which suggests my involvement with anal mouthplay. Did you really think my comment was the worst?

Leticia said...

Ahh..Jez, there is a moral outrage about Harvey Milk Day and the worst of all, the Hate Crimes Bill being passed. Abouna, was speaking metorphically. There are many of us who are very angry and worried about this bill. We are going to be muffled and could even wind up in jail for speaking what we believe to be correct. We are not going to have equal speaking rights as the gay community.

I didn't mean to single you out. It's just that Abouna is a man of the cloth and an elder. I respect him.

You have every right to speak your mind here just as anyone else. And I do apologize if I made you feel less inferior.

MK said...

Aw poor jezzy, feelings hurt now, how terrible, don't you have a box of tissues lying around.

"Always trying to be nice..."

Yeah, that's why you called someone who wasn't speaking to you a 'fool'. Nice try at weaseling and slithering.

"MK's which suggests my involvement with anal mouthplay"

"Anal mouthplay", where did you get that from jez, all i mentioned was that you may be some sort of ass-expert and muffling your voice and you jump straight to some sort of oral gay sex(?). Sounds like you did have a good weekend, well good for you chump. Does confirm some suspicions i've had, thanks.

jez said...

Leticia: Abouna's metaphor was silly, and while I don't think it was not nice to point that out, I also recognise that I don't have any right to speak anything here, only your indulgence.

MK: Classy. I'm not upset in the least, but I was genuinely curious as to why Leticia selected my remarks for censure when yours were the are the more obvious candidate. This recent offering of yours would also qualify way ahead of any of mine.
By the way, your friend and Fascist Nick Griffin was on question time (BBC television discussion program) last Friday.

MK said...

"MK: Classy."

Thanks, very kind of you.

"I'm not upset in the least...."

Lies.

"....but I was genuinely curious as to why Leticia selected my remarks for censure when yours were the are the more obvious candidate."

More lies and you know it.

"This recent offering of yours would also qualify way ahead of any of mine."

More lies, it was your offering that i commented on.

"By the way, your friend and Fascist Nick Griffin was on question time (BBC television discussion program) last Friday."

Now you're just making stuff up, i've never been friends with Nick Griffin, never even met the man. And judging by what i saw of the video you are referring to, you lot are the real Fascists. Why bring up Nick Griffin, is that your lame attempt at changing the subject? Realized you've said too much perhaps? You're right on that count.

jez said...

"And judging by what i saw of the video you are referring to, you lot are the real Fascists."

Well there you have it.
Griffin, for anyone still playing along at home, heads up the British National Party, an openly racist organisation with a policy of enforced "repatriation" of "non-indigenous" British people.
Somehow though "my lot", whoever we are, manage to be even more fascist than that, according to MK. I admire your balls, making that outrageous claim, but that's about all I can possibly admire about you.

"Why bring up Nick Griffin, is that your lame attempt at changing the subject?"
Nope, I'm happy to continue talking about how unpleasant your remarks are compared to mine alongside this. If you could offer any defence other than decorating my comments with the word "lies" at random intervals, then I'd have something substantive to respond to on that subject.

You're thoroughly unpleasant, MK, and your support of the BNP is relevant inasmuch as it illustrates your unpleasantness.

I'm not trying to be nice here, except to Leticia who might want to reconsider that kind of viper that she nurses on her blog.

MK said...

"Somehow though "my lot", whoever we are, manage to be even more fascist than that, according to MK."

You lot's refusal to let them speak or do what is within the law of the land make you fascists, it's plainly obvious, unless off course you're a fascist, that is. I have to admit that i am making an unfounded assumption that you are not stupid jez.

"I admire your balls..."

Thanks, but you can keep your admiration chump. I wish there was something i could admire about you. Perhaps if you could be honest..... but we both know that ain't going to happen.

"If you could offer any defence other than decorating my comments with the word "lies" at random intervals, then I'd have something substantive to respond to on that subject."

Well you are lying and i called you out for it, i know it must be difficult for you to speak in plain & direct language but you're inability doesn't hinder me.

"You're thoroughly unpleasant, MK..."

I feel the same way about you jez, i find your kind repulsive and vile.

"I'm not trying to be nice here..."

Yes i know, you never were, but nice of you to finally admit it.

".....except to Leticia who might want to reconsider that kind of viper that she nurses on her blog."

oooohhh, 'viper', never been called that before. Can't say it's very original though.

What's the matter jez, getting a bit hot for you son, in case you didn't know, no one's holding you here.

jez said...

1) You don't know who "my lot" is.
2) Griffin was invited to appear, and did appear on question time. He is also permitted to run his despicable racist party. Who has refused to let him speak?
3) These liberties are extended despite the illegality, in which even the BNP has acquiesced, of its membership criteria.
4) Griffin personally has past convictions for inciting racial hatred. I hope you won't consider me a fascist for expressing my disappointment that he merely received a fine and a suspended sentence, instead of seeing time in jail. However, you are simply mistaken (or lying) in your professed belief that either he or his party only "speak or do what is within the law of the land."

The BNP is a racist, nationalist party with indisputably Fascist origins, and which Griffin described in the 90s, with approval, as "a strong, disciplined organisation with the ability to back up its slogan ‘Defend Rights for Whites’ with well-directed boots and fists."
During his leadership, he has sought to change the presentation ("suits not boots"), but the wretched content remains the same.

You express a preference for plain & direct language. You should be aware that Griffin is incapable of it. His performance on question time is an example (eg. his refusal to answer the question about holocaust denial), but his labyrinthine ideological history is another. Former colleagues of his describe him thus: "He has been a conservative, a revolutionary nationalist, a radical National Socialist, a Third Positionist, a friend of the ‘boot boys’ and the skinhead scene, a man committed to respectable politics and electioneering, a ‘moderniser’. Which is he in reality?"

Another leading BNP member Mark Collett has insisted "National Socialism was the best solution for German people in the 1930s... would you prefer your kid growing up in Oldham and Burnley or 1930s Germany?"

There are various "repulsive and vile" (very original, by the way) videos of rank and file BNP supporters easily available, if you want to get a better idea of what you're supporting. Members and supporters sing neo-Nazi songs, praise the leadership of Adolf Hitler, and give Sieg Heil salutes accompanied by shouts of 'Auschwitz!'.

You really should be aware of Griffin's long history of anti-semitism. Check out his 1997 pamphlet "Who are the Mindbenders?" invoking the tired old fantasy of the jewish-controlled media. He is also famous for denying the holocaust (which he calls the "holohoax" -- I don't know how original that is, but I do know how disgusting I find it. Do you?)
Collett is on video saying "the Jews have been thrown out of every country, including England. There’s not a single European country the Jews have not been thrown out of.... When it happens that many times it’s not just persecution. There’s no smoke without fire."

Now tell me again that I'm more fascist than these bastards, and this time, tell me what I do that makes me fascist.

"no one's holding you here."
I know, I pursue this only so that Leticia might learn that you associate with racist thugs.

MK said...

"1) You don't know who "my lot" is."

Yes i do, have for a while now.

"Who has refused to let him speak?"

You are lying again jez or you are obviously dumber than i thought, google it if you like, but i can't make you see the truth, so keep lying to yourself.

"However, you are simply mistaken (or lying) in your professed belief that either he or his party only "speak or do what is within the law of the land.""

If they are outside the law, then jail them or punish them, doesn't bother me. Until then, suck it up jez, or go and write to someone to prosecute them and jail them. Just don't expect me to follow your stupidity.

"...if you want to get a better idea of what you're supporting...."

You can ramble on all you want to chump, but where have i expressed support for the BNP and their policies, where have i asked people to vote for them, where is your proof that i am a member of the BNP?

"...tell me what I do that makes me fascist."

What would you like to be done with the BNP, answer that honestly, and you'll see. But we both know you won't, so carry on lying.

"I pursue this only so that Leticia might learn that you associate with racist thugs."

Keep pursuing chump, where have i associated with racist thugs, attended BNP rallies have i? Where is your proof, fascist liar?

jez said...

"Yes i do [know who "my lot" is], have for a while now."

Oh go on, MK, do tell. I'd enjoy reading a new paranoid fantasy.

"You are lying again jez or you are obviously dumber than i thought [if I think that Griffin's party is not being censored]."

I think you must have got into a muddle. Griffin recently appeared on prime-time television amid a storm of publicity, and he was elected to the European parliament. He seems to enjoy an exceptional freedom of speech, which he extends regularly through broadcasting his "thoughts", such as the suggestion that boats carrying immigrants should be sunk. So to repeat the question from a slightly different angle, what has he been prevented from saying?

"If they are outside the law, then jail them or punish them, doesn't bother me. Until then, suck it up jez, or go and write to someone to prosecute them and jail them. Just don't expect me to follow your stupidity."

You've got muddled again, you made the erroneous claim that the BNP didn't break any laws, I just corrected that for you.

"where have i expressed support for the BNP and their policies, where have i asked people to vote for them, where is your proof that i am a member of the BNP?"

one example, you lying racist.

"What would you like to be done with the BNP"

Well I have my violent fantasies, of course. I'm only human. But really I'd simply like them to be unpopular, and for people to share my scorn and disgust for them. That's all. I wouldn't mind if they didn't exist, but I don't want to ban them.
Also, I'm aware that we were forced into a global state of total conflict due to Fascism in the 1930s. I don't expect that to happen again, but it does demonstrate that there comes a point where violent opposition is not only excusable but required. I'm not sure where that point is, but in all serious there are circumstances under which I would use force against the racist extremists.

MK said...

"Oh go on, MK, do tell. I'd enjoy reading a new paranoid fantasy."

Look in the mirror if you want to see a fantasy, more like a dumb joke though, but you can dream big things of yourself.

"You've got muddled again, you made the erroneous claim that the BNP didn't break any laws, I just corrected that for you."

I didn't and you didn't correct anything. You're back to lying again jez.

"one example, you lying racist."

That's is, that's all you got, one link from back in June on an American website? Talk about a paranoid fantasy. In case you didn't know, Americans can't vote in Britain, dumb fascist. And don't call me a racist, you're such a fool if you think that.

Nothing in that comment constitutes asking people to put them into power. I ask again, where have i asked people to vote for them, where is your proof that i am a member of the BNP?

"Well I have my violent fantasies, of course."

Exactly fascist, you're lying when you said you don't want them banned. Thanks for proving my point.

"But really I'd simply like them to be unpopular, and for people to share my scorn and disgust for them. That's all."

Be honest for once in your life, you want to force people to share your thoughts on them don't you. Otherwise you would be here fighting with me about them. If you really thought that, you'd just leave it. Your actions show your real feelings, fascist jez.

"......but in all serious there are circumstances under which I would use force against the racist extremists."

If the people of britain don't share your hatred of the BNP, you'll resort to violence to have your way, won't you. Screw the people's rights, wishes and all that eh.

jez said...

Can you back up any of the dozens of accusations of lying you've lodged, or are they all just mindless empty posturing? Is it something that you're trying to repeat enough times that it becomes believable... (that was one of Hitler's methods of course!)

You claimed that the BNP only tried to act within the law of the land, but Griffin's and others' criminal records should reveal your error to you without any further help from me.

To whom did you direct this remark: "i say give the BNP a go and see how it turns out". Perhaps you were in a muddle when you made that comment too, but did you not mean "vote for" when you said "give them a go"? Whatever you meant, your comments are clearly warm and well-disposed towards the party, which is all that I claimed. You're using dishonest debating tactics (of course) by trying to move it on to proving your membership of the BNP, which is not something I ever suggested.

"you want to force people to share your thoughts on them don't you."

Don't tell me what I think, I speak for myself. I take freedom of speech seriously and you have no basis for thinking that I don't. Freedom of speech does not mean "don't argue or strongly disagree with despicable hate-filled and ignorant points of view like the BNP's". We all have our rights, harold.

I can disagree with you, and not be a fascist.
I can argue against your position, and not be a fascist.
I can call you a dick, and not be a fascist.
What's harder is to argue for the expulsion (sorry... "voluntary repatriation", "permanent guest status" -- these were also phrases used by Hitler, you'll notice) of non-indigenous citizens, or to argue that mixed race marriages are neither "moral or normal", and not be fascist.

I understand that you might prefer arguing with yourself than with a real second person, since that way you might get to win sometimes, but I recommend not to embarrass yourself with public onanism.

jez said...

"you'll resort to violence to have your way, won't you. Screw the people's rights, wishes and all that eh."

Yes, in much the same way as we screwed the German people's democratic rights in WW2, and for exactly the same reasons.

MK said...

"Can you back up any of the dozens of accusations of lying you've lodged...."

No need to, they are obvious and it's obvious that you won't admit them, so there is no point.

"You claimed that the BNP only tried to act within the law of the land..."

No dumbass, i've only said and said repeatedly that if they are breaking the law now or in the past, then prosecute them and punish them. For some unknown reason to you that means they did nothing wrong and must be given votes or else.

"but did you not mean "vote for" when you said "give them a go"?"

I wasn't talking to you in that post, if i was [knowing your normal confused, paranoid state] i would have tried to draw some pictures and explain things in a sort of long-winded way given how thick you are. It's an Australian phrase which can mean and was meant to say, calm down and see how they do, instead of buying the hysteria and smears from the media and haters like yourself. Another way of saying, get all the facts and truth and then make up your own mind. Something you seem to have significant trouble in allowing others to do, sort of like a fascist.

Given that that is the only link which you can find where i supposedly called for people to join the BNP and vote for them, it looks like you've been caught making stuff up, as usual and not that you'll be able to admit it. Oh and i know you've forgotten, so i'll remind you, again.

"By the way, your friend and Fascist Nick Griffin..."

Where is your proof that i am friends with nick griffin? Surely in all your furious searching on the internet, you'd have found at least one picture of me cohorting with Griffin who seems to frighten and irritate you to no end.

"Don't tell me what I think, I speak for myself."

And you speak volumes about your inner self, keep going jez, it's quite revealing.

"Freedom of speech does not mean "don't argue or strongly disagree with despicable hate-filled and ignorant points of view like the BNP's"."

Yeah, and, your point? If you want to debate with them, nobody stopping you, go on jez, go and debate them then, i'm sure with your amazing internet search skills you'll be able to find where they are in Britain. And given how hysterical you are about them, they must be everywhere, making your task that much easier.

Continued below...

MK said...

"I understand that you might prefer arguing with yourself than with a real second person...."

Here i am debating [i must say it's not really a debate, what with you constantly making stuff up and slithering around, but i'll humor you, i know, i'm nice that way] with a fool for days on end on topics that said fool brought up for questionable reasons and yet i am the one who is frightened of debate, go figure. Either that or you're not a real person then? I don't consider you a nice person, and i'm sure you feel the same way about me, but i did consider you a real person. If you are not, why am i here.

"...since that way you might get to win sometimes..."

Oh so this is about winning, a game of some sort, tell you what jez, if that's the case, you can have this one, in fact why don't you just chalk yourself 200 wins against MK. How's that, you can even frame it, given how precious a 'win' seems to be for you.

onanism? Are we back to the sexual insults again, first it was viper, then racist, going round in circles jez. You're getting creative, i'll give you that much.

"Yes, in much the same way as we screwed the German people's democratic rights in WW2, and for exactly the same reasons."

Now that's what you call dishonest debating tactics. WW2 was not about interfering with German people's right to vote one way or another and you know it. You seem to have trouble with reading, so i'll repeat myself, again.

"If the people of britain don't share your hatred of the BNP, you'll resort to violence to have your way, won't you. Screw the people's rights, wishes and all that eh."

Let me rephrase in a hopefully simpler way, if the people of Britain [not germany jez, focus, i know it's hard for you] decide to vote for the BNP in their millions and they become the ruling party in Britain, will you jez, accept the people's choice and not resort to violence and thuggery to have your way?

jez said...

"No need to, they are obvious and it's obvious that you won't admit them, so there is no point."

If the answer is "no I can't", don't worry I won't think any less of you.

You still won't say what it is they're prevented from doing, or who is preventing them from doing it. Does your complaint have any basis in fact at all?

"Given that that is the only link..."
It isn't. I don't have sufficient leisure time nor inclination to make a full catalog of your comments on this matter. Would you deny that you are sympathetic to the BNP?

"Where is your proof that i am friends with nick griffin?"
I don't believe you are friends with NG, "your friend and fascist Nick Griffin" is an idiomatic expression which you have mistaken.

"And given how hysterical you are about them..."
evidence of hysteria? Is that "obvious" and "pointless" to back up too?

I wouldn't call it a debate either, with you ignoring the other party's points and instead answering points of your own choosing. This is called a straw man argument, and I hoped to draw attention to it with that onanism remark, but you were too busy giggling about masturbation to spot it (presumably after looking it up in a dictionary).

"WW2 was not about interfering with German people's right to vote one way or another"
Wasn't it? The allies' objectives included removal of the Fascists from power, the nazi party was outlawed, even though it had been democratically elected.

I'm conflicted about violence really. Consider Britain's fascist revival in the late 1940s, which was opposed by various groups of Jews, the Labour party and civil rights organisations etc. Some of this opposition was violent, and in the immediate aftermath of WW2 you can easily sympathise. On the other hand, I don't think the violence helped much, and when the opposition quietened down, so too did the BUF.
So I probably wouldn't, but only if it didn't look like it would work. Morally, I think Jews fighting assembled groups of Fascists in 1940s London is about as acceptable as violence gets, and I don't think attacking the BNP would be much different.

MK said...

"If the answer is "no I can't", don't worry I won't think any less of you."

It isn't. Think whatever you want, doesn't bother me.

"You still won't say what it is they're prevented from doing, or who is preventing them from doing it. Does your complaint have any basis in fact at all?"

Again, google it dumbass.

"It isn't. I don't have sufficient leisure time nor inclination to make a full catalog of your comments on this matter."

Yeah sure you don't, you never had the evidence, you just made it up.

"Would you deny that you are sympathetic to the BNP?"

Why should i deny or confirm anything to you given you make up your mind based whatever crap is in your head at the moment?

"I don't believe you are friends with NG, "your friend and fascist Nick Griffin" is an idiomatic expression which you have mistaken."

I'll take that as a retraction of your earlier stupidity.

"evidence of hysteria?"

Look at your constant carping about them, it's obvious, it might not seem hysterical to you, but i don't run my opinions of your behavior past you for approval.

"I wouldn't call it a debate either, with you ignoring the other party's points and instead answering points of your own choosing."

You're projecting again.

"...but you were too busy giggling about masturbation to spot it (presumably after looking it up in a dictionary)."

evidence of giggling about masturbation? or is that another one of your paranoid fantasies.

"The allies' objectives included removal of the Fascists from power, the nazi party was outlawed, even though it had been democratically elected."

Yes, i was merely pointing out that it was not the only reason for the war, which is what you implied in an earlier comment.

So you answer to -

if the people of Britain [not germany jez, focus, i know it's hard for you] decide to vote for the BNP in their millions and they become the ruling party in Britain, will you jez, accept the people's choice and not resort to violence and thuggery to have your way?

is a Yes then?

MK said...

Oh and you are right about me having to look up 'onanism', had to, you see i was right from the beginning, you really are the expert on the various forms of sexual deviancy.

jez said...

"Think whatever you want, doesn't bother me."

That's fine if being wrong doesn't bother you either.

"Why should i deny or confirm anything to you given you make up your mind based whatever crap is in your head at the moment?"

Is the answer "yes, MK is sympathetic to the BNP"?

MK said...

What's your answer to, if the people of Britain [not germany jez, focus, i know it's hard for you] decide to vote for the BNP in their millions and they become the ruling party in Britain, will you jez, accept the people's choice and not resort to violence and thuggery to have your way?

MK said...

"That's fine if being wrong doesn't bother you either."

No dumbass, what i said was, i have no problem with what you think of me, what i said was what i meant. Nothing about being wrong, but off course i understand in that bonehead of yours, whatever you think is right and anything contrary must be wrong.

"Is the answer "yes, MK is sympathetic to the BNP"?"

And why should i answer the question?

jez said...

"what i said was, i have no problem with what you think of me, what i said was what i meant."

Oh dear, you're all of a muddle again, you've forgotten that the thought in question was whether or not I was lying, which I have special insight into. You'll get confused less often if you stick more closely to the point.

"And why should i answer the question?"
I've answered your question at least twice (only you seem to lack the mental wherewithal to pick up on it). Perhaps you don't believe in returning courtesy, but even so, why respond at all if you are unwilling to respond constructively? Lord knows it isn't to showcase your shamefully uninventive vilifications.

Your answer is not needed in any case. You are sympathetic to the BNP, you've already published your sympathy on your blog. You are therefore either
a) too stupid to notice the BNP's racism
b) possess such poor judgement that you don't recognise the overriding importance of the BNP's racism or
c) share the BNP's racist attitudes.

Whichever of those three options applies to you, it adds up to you being worth not a damn.

MK said...

"Oh dear, you're all of a muddle again..."

Wrong again jez.

"I've answered your question at least twice..."

Wrong again jez. What you gave was some wiffle-waffle, not what i'd consider an answer, but i understand that was a real struggle for you, so we'll just leave it at, jez admits to being a violent fascist who doesn't give a damn about the people's choices or their wishes.

"Perhaps you don't believe in returning courtesy..."

I wasn't shown any, but you are partly right, i don't believe in being courteous to your kind.

"Your answer is not needed in any case."

That's what i figured all along, it's the same with all you fascist scum, you made up your mind a long time ago and nothing i say will ever make it through that iron-thick skull of yours. Anyway go ahead chump, believe what you want.

"Whichever of those three options applies to you..."

I'm surprised you didn't just say all of the above, go on chump, we both know you know you want to.

"...it adds up to you being worth not a damn."

Your famous courtesy again eh. It's ok, i don't think much of you either.